Organizations Become What Their Incentives Reward
One idea from a recent essay in National Affairs has stayed with me:
Organizations eventually become what their incentives reward.
That principle applies just as readily to businesses, governments, schools, hospitals, and nonprofit organizations as it does to individuals.
Most nonprofits begin with a clear mission. They exist to solve a problem, serve a community, or improve lives. Over time, however, the challenge shifts from creating the organization to sustaining it. As funding sources change, reporting requirements expand, and regulations multiply, there is a subtle but powerful temptation to optimize for organizational survival rather than organizational purpose.
This is not an argument against government funding. Many nonprofit organizations provide essential services that would not exist without public support. Millions of people benefit from these partnerships every day.
The more important question is whether funding continues to support the mission—or whether the mission gradually adapts to the funding.
Every nonprofit board should periodically ask a few uncomfortable questions:
If this funding source disappeared tomorrow, would we still consider this program central to our mission?
Are we measuring success by meaningful outcomes or by compliance with funding requirements?
Are today’s priorities driven primarily by the needs of the people we serve or by the incentives we face?
These are not political questions. They are questions of governance.
Strong societies are built from the ground up. They depend on strong families, effective schools, vibrant civic organizations, sound infrastructure, thriving local businesses, and communities that take responsibility for solving their own problems. Government has an important role to play, but lasting resilience comes from healthy local institutions that earn the trust of the people they serve.
One implication is that states and local communities should have the flexibility to develop solutions that reflect their own circumstances rather than relying exclusively on national priorities. Problems often look different in rural communities than they do in large cities, and organizations closest to those communities are frequently best positioned to recognize those differences.
Financial sustainability matters. Accountability matters. Public-private partnerships matter.
But mission matters most.
An organization that never loses sight of its purpose can adapt to changing funding sources without losing its identity. An organization that allows incentives to replace purpose may remain financially healthy while slowly forgetting why it exists.
In the end, every organization should periodically return to a simple question:
If we were starting from scratch today, would we build the same organization we have now?
The answer to that question may reveal whether we are still pursuing our mission—or merely preserving our institution.
Further Reading: Daniel Stid, “The Collapse of Federal Funding for Non-profits,” National Affairs, no. 68 (Summer 2026): 82–99.
Copyright 2026. The Informed Kansan. All rights reserved.